ProjectAuto parts plant expansion, Georgia (Jackson County)
D 0 · C 50 · B 65 · A 80+
Qualified ≥ 70 · Conditional ≥ 55 · triggers 0 / 9
Disqualifiers · caps
0 / 9
Est. contract $8.5MConservative
Single-project limit
$9.1MCovers est. contract $8.5M · conservative $8.1M
Aggregate limit
$45.0MCapped by bonding limit · conservative $20.8M
Available capacity
$16.6MAggregate − backlog $28.4MConservative $-7.7M
Low
Backlog 63% · finance score rate 77%
94%
Required 16 / 16 · public records 19 · interviews 5
Weights 40 · 40 · 20 standard
5 interviews · 2 no reply · all designated by the contractor (consent form) · list rule met
Owner’s choice · category score rate × weight
Used
Standard40 · 40 · 20
74.8
B
Record-led50 · 30 · 20
74.7
B
Finance-led30 · 50 · 20
75.0
B
TRIR 3.67 · DART 2.10 — 1.9× · 1.75× BLSBLS peer 2362 · 3 injuries in 2023 · improving in 2025 (3.03) · CAP recommended
Conservative single limit $8.1M < est. contract $8.5M — met under the standard formula ($9.1M)Confirm the surety’s single $15M letter is valid at contract
2022 sub lien 1 (released)Sub interview: paid within 35 days since · recommend a lien-waiver clause in the contract
For the project (≈$8.5M · manufacturing plant expansion), scale, region, type and Korean-owner experience are confirmed, and all three owner references would rehire. Liquidity and bonding capacity are ample, but leverage is only fair and the lagging safety indicators (TRIR · DART) are well above the peer average, so a corrective action plan is an appropriate condition. Total 74.8 · Grade B · PQ Qualified (not conditional).
Verified ÷
contract (3y)
Largest job ÷
contract
Same type ·
same trade
In-state
jobs · license
Korean jobs ·
language
Concurrent
capacity
Key staff ·
organization
Lagging
(TRIR ·
DART · EMR)
Leading
(programs)
Certs ·
quality
Statements
level · span
Liquidity
(CR ·
WC)
Leverage
Profit ·
growth
Size fit
(rev ÷ job)
Backlog vs
agg. limit
Bonding limit
(Single ·
Aggregate)
Insurance
(COI limits)
Liens ·
judgm. · UCC
Owner
interviews
Sub/supplier
interviews
Public
reputation
Disclosure
consistency
Color = rating · symbol = verification mark · the three rows (record 10 · finances 9 · reputation 4) share one width (10 cells · left-aligned)
| Code | Item | Rating | Score | Basis | Mark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | Recordsubtotal | 30.1 / 40 | |||
| R1 | Verified record ÷ contract (3 yrs) | Good | 5.6 / 8 | Confirmed 6 jobs $34.0M ÷ $8.5M = 4.00× | |
| R2 | Largest completed job ÷ contract | Strong | 4.0 / 4 | $9.6M ÷ $8.5M = 1.13 | |
| R3 | Same type · same trade record | Good | 3.5 / 5 | Manufacturing plant · same type confirmed 4 | |
| R4 | In-state record · license | Strong | 3.0 / 3 | Georgia completions confirmed 6 · GC license valid | |
| R5 | Korean owners · Korean language | Strong | 5.0 / 5 | Korean-affiliated confirmed 2 · Korean-speaking PM 1 | |
| R6 | Concurrent capacity | Strong | 2.0 / 2 | Active 4 ÷ 3 PMs = 1.33 | |
| R7 | Key staff · organization | Good | 2.8 / 4 | 3 PMs avg 12 yrs · super changed once | |
| R8 | Safety lagging (TRIR · DART · EMR) | Fair | 2.0 / 5 | TRIR 3.67 = 1.93× BLS · DART 2.10 = 1.75× | |
| R9 | Safety leading (written · mgmt) | Good | 1.4 / 2 | Written programs 7/9 · 17-question 13 | |
| R10 | Certs · quality system | Fair | 0.8 / 2 | No certification · not in CertSearch | |
| F | Financessubtotal | 30.7 / 40 | |||
| F1 | Statement level · span | Good | 2.8 / 4 | Review, 3 yrs (2023–2025) | |
| F2 | Liquidity (current ratio · WC) | Good | 4.9 / 7 | Current ratio 1.80 · working capital $5.3M | |
| F3 | Leverage | Fair | 2.0 / 5 | Debt-to-equity 1.53 | |
| F4 | Profit · growth | Good | 3.5 / 5 | Net margin 3.1% · growth +15%/yr | |
| F5 | Size fit (revenue ÷ contract) | Good | 2.8 / 4 | $41.5M ÷ $8.5M = 4.88× | |
| F6 | Backlog vs aggregate limit | Strong | 5.0 / 5 | Backlog 63% · finance score rate 77% → Low | |
| F7 | Bonding limit (single · aggregate) | Strong | 6.0 / 6 | Single $15M = 1.76× · remaining $16.6M | |
| F8 | Insurance (COI limits) | Strong | 3.0 / 3 | All required limits met · SBWC valid | |
| F9 | Liens · judgments · UCC | Good | 0.7 / 1 | Lien 1 released (2022) · judgments 0 | |
| C | Reputationsubtotal | 14.0 / 20 | |||
| C1 | Owner interviews | Good | 5.6 / 8 | Owners (3) avg 4.04 · rehire 3/3 | |
| C2 | Sub · supplier interviews | Good | 2.8 / 4 | 2 avg 4.05 · paid in 32.5 days · work again 2/2 | |
| C3 | Public reputation | Good | 3.5 / 5 | OSHA Serious 1 (2019 · outside 3 yrs) · 1 lawsuit closed | |
| C4 | Disclosure · document consistency | Good | 2.1 / 3 | 6 of 7 match · minor headcount gap |
Triggered 0 / 9 → no disqualifier or cap · grade final
Company profile · verification marks
The contractor’s identity · registration · license · organization · labor · business relationships. Not scored — only facts checked against official records are recorded.
Marks — confirmed in public records · partly confirmed · per contractor submission
| ID | Item | Detail | Mark |
|---|---|---|---|
| G-1 | Legal name · type · former names | Haverline Industrial Constructors, LLC · Georgia LLC · no former names (eCorp) | |
| G-2 | Registration status · date | Active / Compliance · formed 2011-03-14 · reg. agent on file · 2026 annual filing done | |
| G-3 | Headquarters | Duluth, GA 30096 (Gwinnett County) — eCorp address matches the submitted address | |
| G-4 | Principals · officers · ownership | J. Park (Managing Member · CEO) · M. Choi (CFO) · D. Reynolds (Secretary) / J. Park 70% · M. Choi 30% — no parent company (not in SEC EDGAR) | |
| G-5 | Headcount · union | 62 (roster) · ITA 2024 annual average 58 · non-union (open shop) | |
| G-6 | Main trades · NAICS | Mfg plants · warehouses · offices — new builds and expansions (GC) · concrete and steel management self-performed · finishes subcontracted · NAICS 236220 nonresidential | |
| G-7 | Licenses (by state) | GA General Contractor (Unlimited) · GCCO expires 2027-06-30 · 1 qualifying agent on file · no discipline · no AL · SC license | |
| G-8 | Self-perform · subcontract plan | Self-perform: earthwork management · concrete · steel management · project management / Subcontract: electrical · mechanical · plumbing · finishes | |
| G-9 | Labor · immigration compliance | E-Verify since 2012 (MOU copy matches) · H-2B 0 · no staffing-agency contracts · sub I-9 procedure submitted · no immigration-enforcement reports | |
| G-10 | Diversity certification | None (no MBE · WBE · DBE) | |
| G-11 | Vehicle safety (FMCSA) | USDOT registered · 3 inspections in 24 mo · OOS in normal range · crashes 0 | |
| G-12 | Bank · surety · insurer | Bank credit line $2.0M (per statements) · surety 9 yrs (per letter) · insurer 6 yrs | |
| G-13 | Points of contact | 1 estimating/contracts contact · 1 Korean-speaking PM · website (reference only) | |
| G-14 | Other (on request) | Cyber · ESG · drug testing · personal certs · site safety audit — not requested by client |
Project experienceWeight 40
Record subtotal
30.1 / 40score rate 75%
Only submitted projects whose existence is confirmed in public records (permits · notices of commencement · public procurement · OSHA site · bond disclosures), third-party-signed documents or owner confirmation are counted; we look at scale · type · region · Korean-owner experience · staff · safety · certifications.
| Code | Item | Detail | Rating | Score | Mark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Verified jobs (3 yrs) ÷ contract | Confirmed 6 jobs $34.0M ÷ $8.5M = 4.00× (public records 5 · documents 1 · unverified 1) | Good | 5.6 / 8 | |
| R2 | Largest job ÷ est. contract | $9.6M ÷ $8.5M = 1.13 | Strong | 4.0 / 4 | |
| R3 | Same facility type · same trade | Mfg plants, same type 4 (P-1 · P-3 · P-4 · P-7) · concrete · steel self-performed, finishes subbed | Good | 3.5 / 5 | |
| R4 | In-state record · license | 6 Georgia completions · GC license valid (2027-06-30) | Strong | 3.0 / 3 | |
| R5 | Korean owners · Korean language | Korean-affiliated confirmed 2 (EMMA · map check) · Korean-speaking PM 1 (per roster) | Strong | 5.0 / 5 | |
| R6 | Concurrent capacity (jobs ÷ PMs) | Active 4 ÷ 3 PMs = 1.33 | Strong | 2.0 / 2 | |
| R7 | Key staff · organization | 3 PMs avg 12 yrs · 4 supers 9 yrs · engineers 6 (<10) · owner interview I-3: super changed once | Good | 2.8 / 4 | |
| R8 | Safety lagging (TRIR · DART · EMR) | TRIR 3.67 = 1.93× BLS 2362 · DART 2.10 = 1.75× · EMR 0.94 · fatalities 0 | Fair | 2.0 / 5 | |
| R9 | Safety leading (written · system) | Written programs 7/9 (no confined-space · drug program) · 17-question 13 · part-time safety manager | Good | 1.4 / 2 | |
| R10 | Certs · quality system | No cert · quality procedures · not in CertSearch | Fair | 0.8 / 2 | |
| Record subtotal score rate 75% | 30.1 / 40 |
| PM | 3 · avg 12 yrs’ experience · full-time · 1 Korean-speaking (per roster) |
|---|---|
| Superintendents | 4 · avg 9 yrs’ experience · one superintendent change confirmed in owner interview I-3 |
| Engineers · technical | 6 (Good ≥ 5 · Strong ≥ 10) |
| Concurrent capacity | Active 4 ÷ 3 PMs = 1.33 (Strong ≤ 2.0) |
Rating R6 · R7R6 Strong (1.33 ≤ 2.0) · R7 Good (engineers 6 < 10 · super changed once)
| No. | Project | Owner · type · role | Amount | Done | How confirmed | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P-1 | Auto plant expansion (Jackson Co.)KR | Korean tier-1 · mfg plant · GC | $9.6M | 2024-11 |
| Public record |
| P-2 | New warehouse (Gwinnett Co.) | US logistics · warehouse · GC | $5.2M | 2023-09 |
| Public record |
| P-3 | Electronics plant refit (Hall Co.)KR | Korean tier-2 · mfg plant · GC | $3.1M | 2022-12 |
| Public record |
| P-4 | Food plant expansion (Barrow Co.) | US food co. · mfg plant · GC | $7.8M | 2025-06 |
| Public record |
| P-5 | New office bldg (Fulton Co.) | US developer · office · GC | $5.4M | 2024-03 |
| Public record |
| P-6 | Cold-storage refit (Alabama) | US logistics · warehouse · GC | $4.2M | 2023-05 |
| Unverified |
| P-7 | Equipment footings (Gwinnett Co.) | US manufacturer · mfg plant · GC | $2.9M | 2025-02 |
| Documents |
Confirmed (3 yrs) $34.0M · submitted $38.2M · records 5 · docs 1 · unverified 1 · Korean 2 · Georgia 6 · largest $9.6M (2024)
Public recordDocuments · ownerUnverified (excluded)
① Public records: GC-named permits on county portals · final inspections · COs, recorded NOCs, public bid · contract records, USAspending subcontracts ($30,000+), OSHA inspection addresses, EMMA bond disclosures, lien · preliminary notices.
② Documents: contract + final bill + owner/architect-signed completion certificate (AIA G704) or lien waiver — third-party-signed only.
③ Owner · GC interview. Non-permitted private work (interior · remodels) and sub roles often lack ①, so ② · ③ confirm them. P-6 (Alabama · no portal · owner unresponsive · no documents) is “unverified” and excluded; re-rated if evidence arrives.
Contractor — 300A, 3 yrs · matches ITA public dataBLS peer average (NAICS 2362)
| Year | Hours | Recordable | DART | Fatal | TRIR | DART | ITA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 121,000 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4.96 | 3.31 | Match |
| 2024 | 128,400 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3.12 | 1.56 | Match |
| 2025 | 131,900 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3.03 | 1.52 | ITA due 2026-03 |
| 3 yrs | 381,300 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3.67 | 2.10 | 3-yr total |
TRIR = recordable cases × 200,000 ÷ total hours · DART = days-away/transfer/restricted cases × 200,000 ÷ total hours (per 100 workers/yr)
Rating R8 = Fair — TRIR is 1.93× the BLS peer rate (1.9) (≤ 2.0× band), DART 1.75×, EMR 0.94 ≤ 1.25, fatalities 0. Highwire flags anything over 25% above benchmark and owners typically require EMR ≤ 1.0 → a corrective action plan (CAP) condition is recommended. Independent check of the OSHA severe-injury (SIR) · fatality databases: none.
An EMR below 1.0 earns a workers’ comp premium credit versus peers. Three straight years of increase (0.87 → 0.94) warrant watching, and the three 2023 injuries may feed into the next rating.
| Program | Status | Basis | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ① | Hazard comm. (HazCom) | Held | 29 CFR 1926.59 → 1910.1200(e) written program required |
| ② | Emergency action plan (EAP) | Held | 1926.35 — written required (oral allowed for ≤ 10 employees) |
| ③ | Fire prevention | Held | 1926.24 · 1926.150 — site program required (written per 1910.39) |
| ④ | Respiratory protection | Held | 1926.103 → 1910.134(c) written required (when respirators are used) |
| ⑤ | Silica exposure control plan | Held | 1926.1153(g)(1) written required (concrete · masonry cutting etc.) |
| ⑥ | Confined space program | Not held | 1926.1203(d) written required (permit-space entry) |
| ⑦ | Fall protection program · plan | Held | Subpart M · 1926.502(k) written plan (if alternative) — owners expect written |
| ⑧ | Accident prev. · training | Held | 1926.20(b) · 1926.21 — program required, written is customary |
| ⑨ | Drug · alcohol program | Not held | Not an OSHA requirement — ISN · Highwire (advanced initiative) · owner practice |
17-question self-assessment
Written programs
| Full-time safety mgr | Part-time (one PM covers safety · not a dedicated full-time role) |
|---|---|
| Programs not held | ⑥ Confined space program (needed for applicable work) · ⑨ Drug · alcohol program (owner practice) |
Rating R9Good — written 7 / 9 · 17-question 13 · part-time safety manager (Strong: 8 / 9 · 14 · full-time)
| Contractor’s claim | ISO 9001 — replied “in preparation” · no certificate copy |
|---|---|
| IAF CertSearch | Not listed (checked 2026-09-19) |
| quality | Quality control procedures submitted (internal document) |
Rating R10Fair — no certification · quality procedures submitted (Poor = claimed cert not in CertSearch + no copy)
Weight 40
Finances subtotal
30.7 / 40score rate 77%
Liquidity · leverage · profitability · scale are assessed from three years of CPA-reviewed statements, and capacity to pay is confirmed from bonding · insurance · lien records. Ratios are calculated from the contractor-submitted statements (); bonding · insurance · liens are cross-checked with the surety · workers’ comp board · county records.
| Code | Item | Detail | Rating | Score | Mark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Statement level · span | Review, 3 yrs (2023–2025) | Good | 2.8 / 4 | |
| F2 | Liquidity — current ratio · working capital | Current ratio 1.80 · working capital $5.3M | Good | 4.9 / 7 | |
| F3 | Leverage — debt-to-equity (total liabilities ÷ equity) | Debt-to-equity 1.53 | Fair | 2.0 / 5 | |
| F4 | Profitability · growth — net margin (3-yr total) · revenue growth | Net margin 3.1% · revenue growth +15%/yr | Good | 3.5 / 5 | |
| F5 | Size fit — annual revenue ÷ est. contract | $41.5M ÷ $8.5M = 4.88× | Good | 2.8 / 4 | |
| F6 | Backlog vs aggregate limit (risk rating) | Standard aggregate limit $45.0M vs backlog $28.4M (63%) · finance score rate 77% → Low | Strong | 5.0 / 5 | |
| F7 | Bonding limit — single ÷ est. contract · aggregate remaining | Single $15M = 1.76× · remaining $16.6M ≥ $8.5M · letter issued 35 days ago | Strong | 6.0 / 6 | |
| F8 | Insurance — COI limits met | All required limits met · additional insured Y · SBWC valid | Strong | 3.0 / 3 | |
| F9 | Pay health — liens · judgments · UCC | Lien 1 released (2022) · judgments 0 · UCC normal | Good | 0.7 / 1 | |
| Finances subtotal score rate 77% | 30.7 / 40 |
| Item | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $31,200,000 | $36,800,000 | $41,500,000 | |
| Net income | $900,000 | $1,100,000 | $1,400,000 | |
| Net margin | 2.9% | 3.0% | 3.4% | |
| Revenue growth | — | 17.9% | 12.8% |
Latest year (2025)
Current assets
$11,900,000Current liabilities
$6,600,000Total liabilities
$9,800,000Equity
$6,400,000Cash
$3,100,000Credit line
$2,000,000Current ratio
1.80Good
Leverage
1.53Fair
Net margin (3-yr total)
3.1%Good
Single-project limit (standard)
$9,125,000Largest completed job (2024)
$9,600,000Aggregate limit (standard)
$45,000,000Net cash flow (2025 · net income proxy)
$1,400,000Reported backlog (2026-09)
$28,400,000EMR (2026)
0.94Working capital (2025)
$5,300,000Recordable rate TRIR (3 yrs)
3.67Revenue (2025)
$41,500,000DART (3 yrs)
2.10| Surety · letter | Piedmont Surety & Guaranty Co. (A.M. Best A−) · issued 2026-08-15 (35 days ago · valid within 90 days) |
|---|---|
| Single / Aggregate | $15,000,000 / $45,000,000 · utilization not stated in the letter — remaining = aggregate − backlog |
| COI | GL $1M / $2M · Auto $1M · WC statutory · EL $1M · Umbrella $10M · additional insured Y · expires 2027-03-31 |
| Required | GL $1M/$2M · Auto $1M · EL $1M · Umbrella $5M → all met |
| Workers’ comp | GA SBWC lookup valid · insurer matches the COI |
| Liens (5 yrs) | 1 — filed 2022-06 by an electrical sub → released 2022-07 (circumstances confirmed in interview I-4) |
|---|---|
| Judgments (FiFa) | 0 |
| UCC | 3 — bank blanket lien 1 (2021 · continuing) · equipment leases 2 → normal structure |
Est. contract $8.5M
| Single | Aggregate | |
|---|---|---|
| Standard (TradeTapp formula) | $9.1M 25% × 3-yr avg revenue · letter $15.0M | $45.0M Letter cap — formula $51.9M > letter $45.0M |
| Conservative (Highwire · surety practice) | $8.1M Avg of 3 largest contracts in 3 yrs | $20.8M 50% × latest annual revenue |
Formulas — standard: single = MIN(k × largest completed job · 4 × working capital · 25% × 3-yr avg revenue), aggregate = MIN(10 × equity · working capital ÷ 7.5% · 125% × annual revenue). Conservative: single = MIN(avg of 3 largest in 3 yrs · 3 × working capital · 25% × annual revenue), aggregate = MIN(4 × equity · 7 × working capital · 50% × annual revenue). Neither exceeds the surety letter limits · available = aggregate limit − backlog. Inputs: largest completed job $9.6M · working capital $5.3M · equity $6.4M · revenue 2025 $41.5M · 3-yr avg $36.5M · k = 1.5 (liquidity Good).
backlog ÷ aggregate limit = 63% · backlog + project = 82%
| Severe | High | Moderate | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Backlog ≤ limit | — | Finance score ≤ 29% | 30 ~ 50% | ≥ 51% |
| Limit < backlog < 2× | ≤ 29% | 30 ~ 49% | 50 ~ 69% | ≥ 70% |
| Backlog ≥ 2× | ≤ 49% | ≥ 50% | — | — |
Standard: backlog 63% ≤ 100% · finance score rate 77% → Low (F6 Strong). Under the conservative limits the aggregate limit is $20.8M < backlog, so adding the project available capacity turns negative (−$7.7M) — a condition of “start after backlog burns down” or “re-confirm the aggregate limit by surety letter” applies.
Weight 20
Reputation subtotal
14.0 / 20score rate 70%
Interviews that ask owners and subs directly (12 pts) plus public-record reputation · disclosure consistency (8 pts). Interviewees are limited to the owners · subs · suppliers the contractor designated on its “reference list · consent form” (list rule: owners of the 3 largest completed jobs in 3 yrs · the 2 largest sub contracts); the contractor itself and undesignated third parties are not interviewed. Contacts are verified via main numbers · LinkedIn before the call and recorded anonymously.
| Code | Item | Detail | Rating | Score | Mark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Reputation — owner interviews | Owners (3) avg 4.04 · rehire 3/3 · list rule met (top 3) | Good | 5.6 / 8 | |
| C2 | Reputation — sub · supplier interviews | Sub · supplier (2, top 2 contracts) avg 4.05 · paid in 32.5 days avg · work again 2/2 | Good | 2.8 / 4 | |
| C3 | Public-record reputation — violations · enforcement · lawsuits · complaints · media | OSHA Serious 1 (2019 · outside 3 yrs) · 1 lawsuit closed · enforcement 0 · complaints 0 · media 0 | Good | 3.5 / 5 | |
| C4 | Disclosure · document consistency | 6 of 7 match · minor headcount gap | Good | 2.1 / 3 | |
| Reputation subtotal score rate 70% | 14.0 / 20 |
Average
4.04Average
Average
4.05 / 5Avg days to pay
32.5 daysWould work again
2 / 2| ID | Respondent | Average | Paid in | Again |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I-4 | Electrical sub | 3.8 | 35 days | Y |
| I-5 | Steel supplier | 4.3 | 30 days | Y |
Rehire Y
NPS 8
Owner · construction deputy managerKorean tier-1 supplier (P-1)
Completion was six weeks late, but they flagged the equipment delivery issue early and finish quality was good. The three change orders were reasonably priced. Having a Korean-speaking PM made reporting to headquarters easy.
2026-09-15 · phone 25 min · KoreanListed (consent 4.4) · verified via owner’s main number
Rehire Y
NPS 7
Owner · facilities directorUS logistics company (P-2)
All change orders were documented. At this size ($5M range) we would use them again, but above $20M I think more vetting is needed.
2026-09-16 · video 20 min · EnglishListed (consent 4.4) · matches permit owner · main number verified
Rehire Y (if same PM)
NPS 7
Owner · plant managerKorean tier-2 supplier (P-3)
The superintendent changed once mid-project and the handover could have been better. The result was fine, and with the same PM we would hire them again.
2026-09-17 · phone 15 min · KoreanListed (consent 4.4) · employment confirmed on LinkedIn
Again Y
Paid in 35 days
Sub · electrical sub ownertop-2 sub contract · 2022 lien history
In 2022 we were paid more than 45 days late once and filed a lien; it was cleared right away. Since then money comes within 35 days on average. We would work with them again.
2026-09-16 · phone 15 min · EnglishListed (consent 4.4 · list rule) · checked against GSCCCA lien record
Again Y
Paid in 30 days
Supplier · steel supplier salestop-2 sub · supply contract
They generally keep to 30-day terms. Site material receiving is well organized.
2026-09-17 · phone 10 min · EnglishListed (consent 4.4) · main number verified
| Owner · P-4 food company facilities | 3 attempts (9/15 · 9/17 · 9/18) · no response |
|---|---|
| Sub · mechanical sub | 2 attempts · declined to respond (company policy) |
| Source | Finding | Mark |
|---|---|---|
| OSHA | 2019-04-11 Planned · Serious 1 — 1926.501(b)(13) fall protection · $4,200 → paid · closed / 2023-08-22 Complaint · no violation · closed | Watch |
| Environment (ECHO · GA EPD) | No registered facility · no enforcement order | — |
| Wages (WHD) | Cases 0 · no repeat-violator flag | — |
| Sanctions (all) (Violation Tracker) | 0 | — |
| Federal exclusion (SAM) | None | — |
| Lawsuits (5 yrs) | State civil case 1 (2020 defendant · sub pay · settled 2021) · federal 0 | Watch |
| BBB | A− (not accredited) · complaints 0 in 3 yrs | — |
| Media (secondary source) | No adverse media | — |
| Item | Contractor disclosed · submitted | Public records | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lawsuits (5 yrs) | 1 disclosed (2020 sub pay dispute · closed) | Court record 1 | Match |
| Liens (5 yrs) | 1 disclosed (2022 · released) | GSCCCA 1 | Match |
| Sanctions · exclusions | None | SAM · WHD · VT none | Match |
| Terminations · unfinished | None | No conflict in interviews · records | Match |
| Fatality · severe injury (5 yrs) | None | SIR · fatality DB none | Match |
| Headcount | 62 disclosed | ITA 2024 annual avg 58 | Minor gap |
| License · entity info | Copies submitted | Match GOALS · eCorp records | Match |
scope · formulas
S1 Documents
17 / 18
missing1
S2 Public records
19
Watch3unverifiable2
S3 Interviews
5
No response · declined2
Documents not received, public-record items with findings or that could not be verified, and their effect on the ratings. Items confirmed without findings appear in the relevant sections.
| S1 | Documents | 17 / 18 received (required 16 / 16) · received 2026-09-08–15 |
| S2 | Public records | 19 checked (2026-09-19) — entity · license · federal exclusion · OSHA (inspections · ITA · severe injury) · environment · wages · sanctions · liens · judgments · UCC · courts · E-Verify · workers’ comp · certifications · BBB · permits · bond disclosures · vehicles · media |
| S3 | Interviews | 5 (owners 3 · sub · supplier 2) · no response · declined 2 · all designated by the contractor (reference consent form 4.4) · the contractor itself and undesignated third parties not interviewed |
| Not used | Contractor website · marketing material · self-published claims — projects · certifications · headcount · revenue — not used as evidence for anything · media reports flagged only, as a secondary source |
| Document | Source | Status | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO certificate copy | Opt. | missing | R10 certs · quality “Fair” (no certification · procedures only) — not met if the owner requires ISO 9001 |
| Source | Finding | Source | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| OSHA IMIS | Inspections 2 · Serious 1 (2019 · $4,200 paid) · 2023 no violation | Watch (>3y) | C3 public reputation — outside 3 yrs, one minor case → “Good” (not Strong) |
| GSCCCA liens · judgm. · UCC | Lien 1 (2022-06, electrical sub · released 2022-07) · judgments 0 · UCC 3 (bank blanket 1 · leases 2) | Watch | F9 pay health “Good” (not Strong) · claimant sourced for C2 interview · flag — lien-waiver clause recommended |
| Gwinnett courts · CourtListener RECAP | State civil case 1 (2020 defendant · sub pay dispute · settled 2021) · federal 0 | Watch (closed) | C3 stays “Good” (1 closed case) · matches C4 disclosure |
| IAF CertSearch | Not listed (contractor: 9001 in preparation · no certificate) | unverifiable | R10 “Fair” — claim withdrawn, so not “Poor” · not met if ISO is required |
| County permit portals (Jackson · Gwinnett · Hall · Barrow · Fulton) · Alabama | 5 of 7 matched to permits · inspections passed · P-6 Alabama has no permit portal | P-6 unverified | P-6 $4.2M excluded from the R1 total → 6 jobs $34.0M (4.0× · Good). If P-6 is confirmed, 4.5× — rating unchanged |
This report is an opinion as of the inquiry date and does not guarantee contract performance. It is for the client only; the contractor receives only the items to improve and its completeness score.
× weight
standard 40 · 40 · 20
74.8 / 100
Grade A ≥ 80 ·
B ≥ 65 · C ≥ 50 · D
BQualified
Qualified ≥ 70 · Conditional ≥ 55
Item scoring Strong 100% · Good 70% · Fair 40% · Poor 0% × weight → category subtotals (record 40 · finances 40 · reputation 20) → total 100. Weight options (owner’s choice in the intake survey): standard 40·40·20 · record-led 50·30·20 · finance-led 30·50·20 — category score rate × chosen weight. Grade A ≥ 80 · B ≥ 65 · C ≥ 50 · D. PQ Qualified ≥ 70 · Conditional ≥ 55. Disqualifiers G1–G3 · G5 · G7 → D, caps G4 · G6 → C, G8 → B, G9 → provisional. Limit = minimum of the formula candidates surety letter limit · available = aggregate limit − backlog. Risk = TradeTapp table (percentile → finance score rate).